----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103973/#review10609 -----------------------------------------------------------
Is it acceptable to send new features/extensions against KDE4.x ? I had the impression only bugfixes, and I tried to push my changes against the frameworks branch instead. I may have been wrong with that though. - Laszlo Papp On Feb. 13, 2012, 7 p.m., Dawit Alemayehu wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103973/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Feb. 13, 2012, 7 p.m.) > > > Review request for kdelibs and David Faure. > > > Description > ------- > > This patch adds a new KPart extension, BrowserSettingsExtension, for setting > as well as accessing a browser engine's properties in a generic fashion from > KPart plugins. This is yet another step towards making Konqueror's plugins > and settings module independent of the default browser engine in use. IOW, > they do not have to directly link to a specific browser engine. > > > Diffs > ----- > > kparts/CMakeLists.txt 96fa31f > kparts/browsersettingsextension.h PRE-CREATION > kparts/browsersettingsextension.cpp PRE-CREATION > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103973/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Dawit Alemayehu > >
