On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 01:14, Teemu Rytilahti <t...@iki.fi> wrote: > This really depends on how it'd be used, but perhaps yeah, > this might be a > good idea indeed. This is something I encountered while > working on a course > paper earlier this semester. Similar systems are up there for > Mozilla > (Socorro[1], shown in here [2], Microsoft [3] and Ubuntu too. > I bet that > LibreOffice might have something similar too, but haven't > looked into that. Interesting. But no system provides a "solution" I think. Socorro looks very powerful - but they need to process much more crashes.
>> - user posts the crash, crashes.kde.org doesn't find a > duplicate. User >> gets the possibility to >> subscribe to updates for this crash to get an email when a > solution >> for his crash was entered >> by the developers > > I don't like the idea of having a separate place for comments > and/or > solutions, but that's just me. In my opinion the commenting > could happen in > a valid b.k.o entry as needed. Sounds good. One place is enough and fragmentation would be bad. > - If there would be a separate crash-site, could it be worth > to allow crash > reports without login? Maybe. But I would say we need the email address of the user to contact him back. > - Data sanitation? Ubuntu doesn't reveal the crash reports per > default as > they might contain something which shouldn't be public. Right. But that sounds like manual work. But currently DrKonqi also just posts the backtrace. Niko