On Sunday 08 April 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Diumenge, 8 d'abril de 2012, a les 17:13:54, Pau Garcia i Quiles va ... > > I can tell you TestComplete's support for Qt is pretty limited. I have > > not tested LDTP because we needed support for Windows and Linux for our > > Qt projects. > > > > Squish is the best tool we evaluated at work for Qt, it does support Qt > > Quick and there is a company maintaining it (Froglogic, founded by KDE > > developers and employing many KDE developers). A few more arguments > > pro-Squish: it's cross-platform (which means we can run the same tests on > > Linux, Windows, Mac and any other platform we support) and the > > client-server architecture is very useful when testing client-server > > applications, actual environments and/or using virtualization to run the > > UI tests after each daily build. > > Did you guys ever try Testability? I've been using lately and works pretty > well and has the added value of being Free Software.
We use Squish at work and it works well. Beside that, there is a new project called QtTesting from Kitware which can be used kind of like Squish. It's still very new, and I haven't tried it myself. It's available for download here, http://paraview.org/gitweb?p=QtTesting.git;a=summary Quoting Marcus: "git clone git://paraview.org/QtTesting.git should get it, we use it as a submodule in ParaView, and their is some documentation/an example in the repository." Maybe somebody wants to give it a try. Alex
