On Wednesday 30 May 2012 17:47:31 Alex Fiestas wrote: > On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 11:56:00 PM Dan Vratil wrote: > > On Monday 28 of May 2012 20:34:51 Alex Fiestas wrote: > > > libgapi seems ok to me. > > > > I'm sorry, but unless there's an objective objection, I'll rename the > > library and everything inside to LibKGAPI. > > What about LibQGAPI ? > > There is a trend of making libraries called "tier1" which only depend on Qt.
Note however that we use the "K" naming in those though. It's a vendor thing, the Qt (for libs) and Q (for libs and classes) namespaces are for the Qt project itself. The KDE community uses the K namespace in most cases. So for something produced and hosted by the KDE community I think libkgapi is a more proper name than libqgapi. Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
