On Sunday 1 July 2012 09:49:11 Kevin Ottens wrote: > [...] > My opinion is that I would love to go for it, and if over time that turns > out to be a problem, we could ship a dump of the relevant wiki content > along the application. It'd be used as fallback if the wiki cannot be > reached online.
Actually, after sleeping on it, it made me realize that this point above renders the discussion moot from a KDE Frameworks standpoint. On my side I was trying to determine if we had a way out from invokeHelp(). But as soon as you need this type of extra behavior, you need to have something like invokeHelp(), so our solution doesn't lie with the "wiki or docbook" discussion. Anyway, thanks everyone involved for the input provided. It was also a good opportunity to evaluate how our current doc team perceive userbase use for manuals (although that was just a fringe interest from KDE Frameworks perspective), I think the outcome there is pretty clear. :-) Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
