El Dijous, 30 d'agost de 2012, a les 11:51:07, Allen Winter va escriure:
> On Wednesday 29 August 2012 10:06:56 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El Dimecres, 29 d'agost de 2012, a les 21:15:14, Alexander Neundorf va
> >
> > escriure:
> > > On Wednesday 29 August 2012, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > > > On 2012-08-29, Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org> wrote:
> > > > > Yes, this is what we did.
> > > > >
> > > > > Let me rephrase the question.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is what we did the correct thing? (I'm not saying it is or it is
> > > > > not,
> > > > > just that i have to tag 4.9.1 tomorrow and i want to know if I have
> > > > > to
> > > > > increase that or not).
> > > >
> > > > having them saying {4,5}.9.1 for 4.9.1 is the good thing to do.
> > >
> > > I think I agree, but I can remember that when this was discussed quite
> > > some
> > > time ago here there were arguments against this...
> >
> > Do you have any poiter to those discussions?
>
> We discussed this on IRC last night.
> The only downside we could come up with was extra disk space needed by the
> developers if we weren't vigilant about cleaning-up older library versions.
Ok, let's try it for the 4.9.x cycle and after it we see how it went.
I've increased the version to 4.9.1 and 5.9.1
Cheers,
Albert
