Great. :) I personally agree with the internal python reasoning, and it can be changed later anyway if it turns out to be a real problem.
Laszlo On 12/25/12, Sven Brauch <svenbra...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > since there were no further questions or complaints, I will consider > kdev-python to have passed the review process now. Thanks! > > Greetings, > Sven > > 2012/12/21 Sven Brauch <svenbra...@googlemail.com>: >> Hello, >> >> the two-week review period for this project (kdev-python) has passed. >> The only complaint raised was related to the python fork in the >> repository. Was the necessarity of this sufficiently explained by my >> follow-up email, or does anyone think this issue needs further >> discussion? >> >> Best regards, >> Sven >> >> 2012/12/7 Laszlo Papp <lp...@kde.org>: >>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Milian Wolff <m...@milianw.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Friday 07 December 2012 06:01:19 Laszlo Papp wrote: >>>> > > Out of the curiosity: how much python3 is available? Thank you for >>>> > > your >>>> > > work. >>>> > >>>> > python3 _support_ >>>> >>>> please read http://scummos.blogspot.de/2012/11/kdev-python-14-stable- >>>> released.html >>>> >>>> 1.5 will get python3 support >>> >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Laszlo >