----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110687/#review33274 -----------------------------------------------------------
Maybe I'm blind, but I don't see any patch attached to the review :s - Àlex Fiestas On May 28, 2013, 8:03 a.m., Jekyll Wu wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110687/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated May 28, 2013, 8:03 a.m.) > > > Review request for KDE Runtime and George Kiagiadakis. > > > Description > ------- > > As I have said in https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315073#c3, Bugzilla's > new and nice behavior (since 4.2.5) of rejecting reports against disabled > versions brings a new usability problem to DrKonqi: users spend value time in > downloading debug symbols, generating the backtrace, writing all information > he/she can recall, but in the end only to find an error dialog which tells > them (in a not so clear and friendly way) that bugs.kde.org won't receive > his/her report. > > I would propose making version checking the very first step in the reporting > assistant: a perfect bug report against a outdated version is still useless. > > > > > > This addresses bug 315073. > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315073 > > > Diffs > ----- > > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110687/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Jekyll Wu > >
