> On June 17, 2013, 9:24 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
> > imageobjectco, supported since the Paleolitic age in DocBook 4.x, can be 
> > included by mediaobjectco, which is not ignored but required for the maps. 
> > The patch removes the imageobjectco.module from the set of ignored modules, 
> > so go for it.
> > 
> > Is it for master?
> 
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
>     Ups, I didn't see "KDE/4.10". But we are going for 4.11 now, is it for 
> 4.11 or post-4.11?
>     
>     For more reference on imageobjectco, 
> http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/imageobjectco.html

I thought master was frozen and the stable branch was the only way to get 
anything into kdelibs?

In fact, we have a couple docs that didn't go into kdelibs for just this reason:
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-doc-english&m=132839141213685&w=2


- T.C.


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111054/#review34535
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 17, 2013, 2:12 a.m., T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111054/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 17, 2013, 2:12 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Documentation, kdelibs and Luigi Toscano.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> allow <imageobjectco> to be used in KDE Documentation
> 
> it is needed to allow imagemaps to work without checkXML errors for the 
> Visual Dictionary in the KDE Fundamentals documentation
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   kdoctools/customization/dtd/rdbpool.elements 3ac2670 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111054/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Made this change in /usr/share/kde4/apps/ksgmltools2/ and saw the checkXML 
> error go away when building the draft fundamentals documentation in 
> branches/work/doc.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> T.C. Hollingsworth
> 
>

Reply via email to