25.09.2013 15:25 пользователь "Aaron J. Seigo" <ase...@kde.org> написал: > > On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 12:35:25 Harald Sitter wrote: > > since everyone who ever was/is/wanted to be Phonon GStreamer > > maintainer is either busy or has no interest in it, the backend has as > > of right now no actual maintenance. > > you may not get much a reply without some more information: > > * is there some underlying reason why there is no interest in maintaining > Phonon GStreamer? e.g. is there a GStreamer annoyance that needs to be known > about / taken into consideration? > > * what are the real-world ramifications of not having GStreamer support? which > platforms might suffer due to a lack of integration / codec support / etc as a > result? > > * what effort is currently required to support Phonon GStreamer? Is it stable > and needing continued testing and bug fixing maintenance; is it need of more > major surgery; is the big work ahead a port to Qt5 or a change in Phonon?
* One more serious question: how well does this backend copes with (recent versions of) GStreamer 1.x?