Hello, On Wednesday 09 October 2013 11:10:03 Lubomir Rintel wrote: > I'm wondering what's your position on naming the packages? Does kf5-* > prefix (kf5-solid, kf5-extra-cmake-modules) make sense to you? OpenSUSE > seems to use that (except that they don't include the prefix for ECM). > [1]
It does makes sense to me to introduce such a prefix. Except for ECM indeed which is more agnostic and about a cmake addon at that point (it's considered as a KF5 upstream). > My other question is about the modularization of kdelibs. Do you intend > to split it into separate GIT repositories? Yes. It's not done yet though as we still keep moving code around. Once it'll settle will split out repositories though. Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net Sponsored by KDAB to work on KDE Frameworks KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
