On Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2013 20:41:28 CEST, Albert Astals Cid wrote:

I am hoping that Andras would let us just revert his changes since reading the commit logs seems like they are only optimizations that ended up wrong (i.e. i hope he wasn't really doing any bugfix).

Depends on how fast Andras can fix this anyway.

The introduced 50ms "initializeTimer" was originally not set singleShot() but 
fixed so with commit 5fedc5ee921f87f320b5465edd80f74cabcfefcf only.
(likely bug #327190)

Therefore I guess the initial constantly fired timer shadowed the now present 
issues what basically means the actual changes have (unintendedly) never been 
really tested.

Patches strongly look like optimization (i guess: "this prevents an ugly 
recursion" would have been commented somewhere....) to me as well, so i'd relax, 
remove them for 4.12.0, this way get Andras enough time to inspect the patches and the 
*actual* behavior and re-add the correct patch for 4.12.1.

(Unless Andras already *has* a fixing patch, of course ;-)

Cheers,
Thomas

Reply via email to