On Sunday 01 December 2013 14:18:35 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On domingo, 1 de dezembro de 2013 13:42:15, Rex Dieter wrote: > > Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > > > On Thursday 28 November 2013, Michael Palimaka wrote: > > >> Any thoughts? > > > > > > In an ideal world we would convince the distros to enable Qt namespace > > > on > > > Qt5, so that Qt4 and Qt5 symbols does not clash, and does not cause > > > crashes when loaded as plugins etc. > > > > Sounds pretty nice, wonder why that is not enabled by default then. > > Because trying to load two different builds into the same process space is > likely going to cause a lot more headache than you anticipate, even with the > namespace sharing. > > For one thing, both Qt will try to own the event loop.
And we'd have a massive porting ahead of us, from class QLineEdit; to QT_BEGIN_NAMESPACE class QLineEdit; QT_END_NAMESPACE -- David Faure, [email protected], http://www.davidfaure.fr Working on KDE, in particular KDE Frameworks 5
