On Friday 17 January 2014 01:47:17 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Thus my suggestion is that after we get the wiki done and we explain > clearly the situation as Thomas Lübking suggested (i.e. if you really > really really really need what Nepomuk provides and can't accept a single > regression in that field, do not upgrade), we go ahead with moving to Baloo > instead of Nepomuk.
I'm concerned about the portability aspect of Baloo. It seems to rely heavily on certain API (fgetxattr) while not testing for the availability of that API. >From a "let's see if this stuff can build" perspective it'd be nice if it gave a (better) hint about missing xapian, along the lines of what most KDE modules do when a required dependency is missing (is that macro_log_optional_feature?). Some files still have the boilerplate <one line to give ...> in the copyright header, too. [ade]