> my understanding was that it's still possible to bypass the code review, so > I cannot see that it's against the KDE Manifesto as it's only a kind of > social contract. Or am I missing something. > > Personally I like the idea of having the +2 limited to the devs familiar > with the code.
I agree, +2 should be retained by the maintainer, or a smaller set of developers as decided by the maintainer. As for submitting, that might not be a necessary requirement (though I'm not against trying it out) - we are a well behaved bunch usually - I don't think anyone would actually commit something that has not passed review. Cheers, Ivan -- KDE, ivan.cukic at kde.org, http://ivan.fomentgroup.org/ gpg key id: 850B6F76, keyserver.pgp.com
