On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org> wrote:
> El Dimecres, 8 d'octubre de 2014, a les 21:02:32, Aleix Pol va escriure: > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Thomas Pfeiffer <thomas.pfeif...@kde.org > > > > > > wrote: > > > On Sunday 05 October 2014 20:30:33 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > > > The reasoning is that this way they will be released together with > > > > > > Plasma > > > > > > > > Workspace. > > > > > > > > I don't see that anyone can have a problem with kde-gtk-config. > > > > > > Risking that someone might kill me for saying this: > > > Given that this configures how GTK applications work inside Plasma and > not > > > inside the KDE community, shouldn't it be renamed to plasma-gtk-config > so > > > we > > > don't add to the branding confusion with our own package names? > > kde-gtk-config does not configure how GTK applications work inside of > Plasma, is > the Gtk theme Configurator made by KDE. > > I'm almost sure that if you use kde-gtk-config in non plasma it will still > change how gtk apps look line. > > Cheers, > Albert > > > > > To be honest, I don't care. In fact it used to be called Chakra GTK > Config. > > It will need somebody to do the change (I can do it, at least on the kde > > side) and it will require distros to adopt the new name, but if it is > going > > to make someone's life easier I'm all for it. > > > > Aleix > > Well, on the other hand it's thought to be used from the systemsettings. A 3rd party project would have to trigger the kcmshell5 or create a separate kcm integration system. >From my point of view, they should convince us then to move it to KDE Applications releases (or just use the one we distribute with the workspace). Aleix
