El Dijous, 11 de desembre de 2014, a les 07:48:51, Aaron J. Seigo va escriure: > On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 15.27:31 Ben Cooksley wrote: > > It has come to my attention that some developers have "issues" with > > KDE infrastructure in certain areas. This is the first time i've heard > > I suspect the issues are the same ones that led us to experiment with gitlab > a while back. Christian's response seems to back that up. > > A modern, consistent, unified, user-friendly interface to the source > lifecycle of a project is pretty desirable. Github and the like have really > set people's expectations there pretty high. Having a bunch of separate > tools with somewhat-to-less-clunky interfaces, each with their own > individual learning curves is just not very attractive when Github sits > there shiny and usable.
and siloed and non-free. > It's also what more and more new developers get to > know through their first experiences. > > Whether gerrit is a useful too or not, another separate tool won't bring the > desired changes. It's an attempt to answer a rather different question, > actually. > > I don't know if it matters to KDE or not, but if appealing to new > generations of developers and keeping existing ones as happy as possible is > a goal[1], then it would make a lot of sense to orchestrate a move to > something that provides such a "github-like" experience, even if it has > other drawbacks. Those drawbacks probably don't matter as much. If they > did, github wouldn't be thriving quite as much as it does. is it thriving in our target audience? Cheers, Albert > > [1] thinking that it "would be nice" or "that would be a good idea" does not > make it a goal
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
