On Friday, December 19, 2014 23:26:15 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dijous, 18 de desembre de 2014, a les 14:52:12, Sebastian Kügler va > > On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 08:47:09 Jeff Mitchell wrote: > > > I understood that to be the case -- I'm really meaning for a general, > > > KDE-wide solution. > > > > > > Personally I don't have an issue with volunteers taking care of > > > non-official systems if it helps their productivity. If Gerrit wasn't > > > where KDE as a whole went, and you wanted to put the effort in to keep > > > Gerrit working for you and integrated with the rest of the KDE systems, > > > more power to you. > > > > > > The issue I see (which doesn't necessarily reflect my personal views) is > > > that KDE projects have been required to use KDE infrastructure. I forget > > > where that's written/required, but I do know that that it exists. The > > > purpose of this was to avoid fragmentation or making it difficult to > > > find the full breadth of KDE projects, or requiring KDE developers to > > > sign up for multiple e.g. bugtracking systems just to comment on another > > > KDE project. > > > > I think you're referring to manifesto.kde.org. There's nothing in there > > about Reviewboard, or a requirement that project have to use > > infrastructure > > hosted at kde.org, so I don't see that as a blocker. > > I don't agree with that you said, manifesto says > > "Online services associated with the project are either hosted on KDE > infrastructure or have an action plan that ensures continuity which is > approved by the KDE system administration team"
I stand corrected. -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
