On 01/31/2015 09:25 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
In short, Qt uses gerrit is a bogus argument in favor of gerrit.
The argument isn't so much that gerrit is working well for Qt, but more that there's a certain simplicity in using the same tooling across the KDE/Qt stack, and that KDE benefits from having more KDE people active in Qt. But I actually find contributing to Qt pretty frus- trating (the infra is flaky, the process tends to break down here and there, and I sometimes have to step out- side gerrit and side-channel via email to get things moving again), yeah. It's one bullet from a long mail that addresses many other points, though ... I agree that the KDE community has concerns and ambitions unrelated to its relation- ship with Qt and a broader activity scope than the Qt project, and our tooling needs to be evaluated in that broader context.
Boudewijn
Cheers, Eike