On Monday 06 of April 2015 15:26:43 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Diumenge, 5 d'abril de 2015, a les 20:47:03, šumski va escriure: > > Hi all, > > > > In review 120393 [1] it was suggested to remove all code that hasn't > > compiled at least since 5.0.0. Nepomuk parts won't work even if the #if's > > would be correctly adjusted, as there isn't Qt5 based soprano, but strigi > > ones in theory should, if the find_package call would be restored. The > > libstreams and libstreamanalyzer libs are Qt-agnostic, strigi can only > > use Qt for the GUI daemon client. > > > > Now i got suggestion by Vishesh and Albert to ask for a general decision > > regarding strigi-related code. > > IMO the code should be killed, as the classes are deprecated even in > > kdelibs4 code, so there isn't much point in bringing it all back in > > kdelibs4support, even though lxr.kde.org still shows some users... > > Can you point to the search you made in lxr.kde.org to know how many users > are out there to have a better view of what it means removing it > altogether?
Sure, http://lxr.kde.org/ident?v=kf5-qt5&_i=KFileMetaInfo&_remember=1 Cheers, Hrvoje > Cheers, > Albert > > > What do others think? > > > > [1]: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120393/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
