El Monday 18 January 2016, a les 20:27:16, Boudewijn Rempt va escriure: > On Mon, 18 Jan 2016, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > Reason that I ask is that due to the split of Calligra into several repos > > (see background^) the layout in the repo structure does no longer > > properly reflect the project organisation. Right now there are three > > active repos in the calligra/ repo substructure: > > "calligra" at "calligra/" > > "krita" at "calligra/krita" > > "kexi" at "calligra/kexi" > > What I'm wondering is, where is this "structure" actually visible? Not in > > https://quickgit.kde.org/ > > or > > https://phabricator.kde.org/diffusion/ > > I see it reflected in the old, to be discarded > > https://projects.kde.org/projects > > But where else? And what is it actually needed for? > > > (("calligra" at "calligra/" confuses at least kdesrc-build, sent an email > > to mpyne about if moving it to "calligra/calligra" should fix it.)) > > > > Things that are not properly matching organization: > > * Krita starting with 3.* no longer is part of Calligra project > > > > (screws e.g. api.kde.org/bundled-apps-api/calligra-apidocs/ and also > > what people think to which project Krita belongs) > > > > * Calligra & Krita are nowhere different to KDevelop, Digikam & Co, > > > > so no reason to be in a complete own toplevel structure, > > rather should be in the same sub structure, i.e. "Extragear", > > like extragear/calligra/* and extragear/graphics/krita > > > > More, not only Calligra & Krita related: > > * "Extragear" is an awful grouping name for apps with individual > > > > release plans, a legacy term that no longer fits most of the apps > > in that substructure > > It's ghastly -- almost insulting. It's perpetuating the fallacy that > there are core KDE projects and peripheral projects. > > > * "KDE Applications" is a misleading grouping name for apps with a > > > > central release plan, as if those with individual release plans > > are not "KDE" applications (as in, not done in the KDE community) > > Horrible as well.
You're always welcome to suggest better names. Cheers, Albert
