написане Wed, 08 Jun 2016 19:27:23 +0300, Burkhard Lück
<lu...@hube-lueck.de>:
Am Mittwoch, 8. Juni 2016, 12:45:13 CEST schrieb Nicolás Alvarez:
2016-06-08 8:33 GMT-03:00 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau <kosse...@kde.org>:
> Am Mittwoch, 8. Juni 2016, 13:10:04 CEST schrieb Sebastian Kügler:
>> Hey,
>>
>> I've been adding appstream metadata to one of the apps I maintain,
among
>> that are also screenshots, in the form of a URL. That means that I
have
>> to
>> put the screenshots on a webserver.
>>
>> Do we already have a canonical location for these screenshots? If
not,
>> let's create one before we get people hosting them on imgur, their
>> private webserver or their router-behind-a-dsl-line. :)
>
> Good idea, also when it comes to long-term availability of referenced
> images>
> :)
>
> It might make sense to reuse/share the screenshots with the ones used
for
> the KDE app catalog we have at kde.org/applications/. For consistency
and
> for efficiency.
>
> Not sure though what a stable url would be like, given people
planning to
> rework kde.org (and thus those app catalog pages), so perhaps relying
on
> the current screenshot urls used by kde.org/applications is not
perfect.
The screenshots on kde.org/applications are stored in SVN and they are
the main reason why I couldn't migrate that website to Git. I would
prefer if you don't add even more there...
www/sites/www/screenshots (svn) has 176 pngs
websites/edu-kde-org/ (git) has 1287 pngs
master kf5 / doc[s] (git) folders have 2079 pngs
master kde4 / doc[s] (git) folders have 1702 pngs
I do not understand why the 176 pngs in www/sites/www/screenshots are a
problem for migration to git
Hi,
I might be wrong, but is the hotlinking to Phabricator/Git files
(screenshots in this case) a good thing?
Best regards,
Yuri
