Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El dimecres, 12 d’octubre de 2016, a les 7:15:31 CEST, Thomas Eschenbacher va > escriure: > [...] >> BTW: how should we handle these findings during review phase: is it ok >> four you to handle/discuss them here on the mailing list, or shall we >> use some bug tracking system? If so, should we use Kwave's current bug >> tracking (which is on sourceforge) or the KDE bug tracking? > > You should be really using KDE Bug tracking, we're simply not going to > release > an application as part of KDE Applications that doesn't use bugs.kde.org
ok, and how should I do this? When I go to bugs.kde.org, then kwave is simply not in the list! And the next question: are there any blocking points that prevent the application from going on to kdemultimedia? (any things that can not be handled by bugtracking?) regards, Thomas