Sorry for top postiing, stupid webmail. Almost all projects start as a one man project, if you reject those you're basically making impossible for them to grow.
Cheers, Albert En lunes, 6 de noviembre de 2017 15:31:34 CET, Tomaz Canabrava <tcanabr...@kde.org> escribió: On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Alexander Potashev <aspotas...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2017-11-06 14:16 GMT+03:00 Kevin Funk <kf...@kde.org>: >> You're free to work on whatever you like to of course, but to me this sounds >> like wasted effort. Your good incentives would be better spent with joining >> up >> with others aiming for the same (LxQt for instance). > > Hi, > > I had a bad impression of LxQt because: > 1. it didn't work for me out of the box, For many people kde applications don't work out of the box too. > 2. it consists of many components, it's hard to figure out which of > them are optional, Also true for kde applications. > 3. it has poor infrastructure compared to KDE, e.g. their i18n server > hadn't been working for about a year. I cant comment on that - but the project seems to be alive as there was a new release just last month with a lot of changes, also they use kf5 libraries where needed. > Thus liquidshell looks better to me than lxqt; joining an inferior > project is not a good idea. please refrain from using words like 'inferior' for a project as it's not helpful. Currently the whole code for liquidshell is done for one person, and we (as in the KDE Sc) suffer for a lot of good projects and ideas that as soon as the original developers get tired the project stalls, like Macaw Movie, Spectacle, Baloo and quite a few others - so I'm really afraid of a one-man-project that's basically what other many projects already do. About liquidshell, I tried but it didn't even compile on my machine (some issue with Solid) > --Alexander Potashev
