But why was that BIC to begin with? Which of the "don'ts" did it violate?
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 11:18 AM Kai Uwe Broulik <k...@privat.broulik.de> wrote: > > To avoid situations like [1] and [2] > > [1] > https://cgit.kde.org/kiconthemes.git/commit/?id=1e9af6c54470e890597739f8f2189b0743a00b6f > [2] > https://cgit.kde.org/kiconthemes.git/commit/?id=083bb8a80fd5941e6fcbaf1ec12a08d8f8c881a5 > > Am 12.07.19 um 11:14 schrieb Harald Sitter: > > Hey > > > > our binary compatibility page [1] states that one should > > > > "reimplement event in QObject-derived classes, even if the body for > > the function is just calling the base class' implementation." > > > > Does anyone know the reason this helps maintain BC? > > > > [1] > > https://community.kde.org/Policies/Binary_Compatibility_Issues_With_C%2B%2B > > > > HS > > > > >
