On Friday, 17 September 2021 00:46:33 CEST Aleix Pol wrote: > On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 5:23 PM Harald Sitter <sit...@kde.org> wrote: > > server-side retracing. I've spent many afternoons reading up on and > > poking demo instances of every somewhat suitable software I could > > find, and Sentry looks like the best option for what we need. It is > > practically free software as far as we are concerned, scales > > tremendously, has systems for server-side deduplication, server-side > > cross-distro/platform retracing (which might also help with some of
https://open.sentry.io/licensing/ It's refreshing to read a straightforward take on this. And indeed, BSL 1.1 is **not** OSI-approved (I've watched plenty of the internal discussions about it and similar licenses) because it falls foul of freedom 0: the freedom to use the software for any purpose. That's roughly the same reason the "do no evil" license isn't OSI-approved ("but daaad, I *want* to do evil!"). > +1 makes sense to me, it's exciting to find new ways that people can > help make our software better without a big effort. > > I'd say the purpose of our manifesto clause that we need to rely > exclusively on FOSS tools wasn't designed for cases like this one. +1 to that, yes. [ade] (pragmatically)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.