Hi Alex, thanks for the quick reply. :)
Am Sonntag, 4. September 2022, 23:42:36 CEST schrieb Alexander Neundorf: > On Freitag, 2. September 2022 12:20:50 CEST Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > we stumbled over some CTestConfig.cmake files in some of the KDE git > > repositories. Which seem to originate from a time where people worked on > > integration with cdash.org, that is a decade ago :) > > > > It seems though this integration no longer is maintained: > > > > * no KDE projects seem listed on cdash.org anymore: > > https://my.cdash.org/viewProjects.php?allprojects=1 > > > > * the KDEUtilsNightly.cmake seems to have found no counterpart in the ECM > > > > world. The only reference seen is the check for the presence of a > > CTestConfig.cmake file and the inclusion of the CTest module in that > > case. > > > > With KDE's deployment of first Jenkins and now Gitlab CI around the > > purpose > > of the integration with cdash.org also seems no longer needed, by what I > > understand? > > > > So can we state that this cdash integration is officially no longer done, > > and thus we can clean up any traces of it, for clean and non-confusing > > data > > & code? > > I think so. Okay. So with the former lead on these efforts having confirmed I consider this then officially a thing of the history, within KDE :) > > Are there any other things left to do to clean up this, besides the > > following? > > > > T1) Remove any remaining CTestConfig.cmake files from KDE repos. All such files should have been removed now or at least be target of a MR, by a research via lxr.kde.org and invent.kde.org. > > T2) Remove support in KDECMakeSettings for deal with CTestConfig.cmake > > files: > > https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/extra-cmake-modules/-/merge_requests/295 Discussion on-going, but should be resolved soon. > > T3) Add a note on the respective Wiki page about being outdated: > > https://techbase.kde.org/Development/CMake/DashboardBuilds Anyone can tell what the official way to tag a page as outdated/historic is on techbase? > sounds good, but I didn't check. So if anyone else knows about some related left-over, please point to it (or action up-on :) ). Cheers Friedrich