El dijous, 31 d’octubre del 2024, a les 13:47:05 (Hora estàndard del Centre d’Europa), Sune Vuorela va escriure: > On 2024-10-30, Darshan Phaldesai <dev.darshanphalde...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Few considerations: > > First, I plan to include bridges for most libraries needed for > > application development and so need to consider their licenses as well. > > Second, This project will only hold the "bridge" code and thus users > > will still need to install the libraries. I don't think this should > > cause any license violations but the bridge code is based of the method > > signatures of the original libraries. > > Third, Upstream `cxx-qt` project uses Apache-2.0+MIT and I planned to do > > the same but KDE's Licensing policy doesn't mention any thing about > > Apache-2.0. > > I'd say just stick the same license on it as the KDE Frameworks in > question. > Given they are a directly derived work and also uses the KDE Frameworks > underneath, giving any other license is just going to be confusing for > the people involved.
+1 Cheers, Albert > > The app developers needs to deal with (l)gpl licenses anyway. > > /Sune
