On 2024-11-03, christ...@cullmann.io <christ...@cullmann.io> wrote: > kde-builder in no drop in replacement, at least for me. > > I and others discussed that close to infinitely in the past with the > kde-builder maintainer.
I agree here. What KDE-Builder at least needs is - all code changes being actually reviewed. - no constant breaking changes that require involvements. - multiple co-maintainers, some with years of KDE baggage. - co-maintainers that has interest in mitigating supplychain attacks. I'm immensely worried about KDE-Builder for various reasons, but the above would at least mitigate some of it. It is not that many days the main contributor to KDE-Builder asked why we weren't building qt5 with cmake, and they have been hacking on things for a year. /Sune
