On Sat, Nov 9, 2024 at 7:20 AM Tomaz Canabrava <tcanabr...@kde.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 at 09:51 Sune Vuorela <nos...@vuorela.dk> wrote: >> >> On 2024-11-03, Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > It's not that simple. The reason I suggested MPL-2.0 is because >> > LGPL-2.1-or-later is effectively the same as GPL-2.0-or-later with >> > Rust because it's statically linked. >> > > > > people lgpl does not forbids static linking. > this is a common misconception but lets not spread it further. >
I didn't say it did. I said that LGPL is effectively the same as GPL in this case, and this is not necessarily desirable. (And the object relinking thing isn't really workable with Rust, as far as I can tell.) -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
