On Wednesday 07 March 2012 10:59:50 todd rme wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Andreas Pakulat <ap...@gmx.de> wrote:
> > On 07.03.12 10:23:32, todd rme wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Klaas Freitag <frei...@kde.org> wrote:
> >> > On 06.03.2012 18:02, todd rme wrote:
> > [...]
> > 
> >> > These kind of things. Not sure if a kio is cool for any of these.
> >> 
> >> A gui able to do all the things you listed would necessarily be
> >> extremely complicated and likely difficult to use, unless most of the
> >> tasks were automated push-button affairs.  In the latter case, there
> >> is little advantage over a kio slave.  I would think that a kio slave
> >> would be more natural, since users would not need to know terminology
> >> or the menu structure.
> > 
> > Maybe I didn't use enough of the more fancy kio-slaves, but I have a
> > hard time imagining how I'd be able to use this with say konqueror. I'd
> > go to
> > 
> > kscan://<scannername>/
> > 
> > And then see whats been scanned, but how do I initiate a scan? Do I need
> > to go to some special url? If so, how do I trigger the OCR creation
> > after scanning?
> 
> To activate a scan of an image, you either drag the image file in the
> kio slave to another folder, or you open it in a program (either by
> clicking or using the right-click menu).  In the case of dragging it
> to a folder, it will be automatically scanned and saved in the
> destination folder without the user needing to do anything else.  In
> the case where you open it in a program, it will probably be scanned
> to a temporary folder or stored in memory and then opened in the
> program, once again without the user doing anything else.
> 
> In the case of OCR, it would be the same, except a temporary image
> file woulds be scanned, OCRed, and deleted (or again stored in
> memory).
> 
> This, at least, is how the CD kio slave does it.
> 

If somebody is interested in making such a kio slave, for simple usecases, I 
would say go ahead and scratch your itch :) I do have a some doubts about the 
usability tho.

1) You would have to "refresh" the view to get a new preview of new photos 
placed on the scanner and the automatic photo finder is bound to fail 
sometimes and you would be unable to select the correct part of the images.

2) You have options (folders?)
 - scan mode: grayscale, color
 - resolution 50 100 150 300 600 1200 2400 4800 ...
 - source: flatbed, automatic document feeder, transparency unit, ...
 - how would you adjust gamma if available
 - contrast/light...
 - ...

3) Multipage scanning from ADF can not have a preview...


For simple point and shoot it might work some of the time but I'm not sure the 
amount of bug reports for heuristics failures would be fun to go through ;)


I think a Qt ORC library would be more than welcome also for the kio slave and 
that could be the main target for the GSoC.


Kåre


>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

Reply via email to