On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:46 AM, Luigi Toscano <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday 24 of June 2015 14:32:23 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >> Hi, >> Bugzilla with all its issues was a bit customized for our needs and >> had a workflow familiar for average user of KDE software and services. >> As we're heading to a switch to the Phabricator Maniphest [1] (so far >> the support from our Sysadmin Team is great!), I'd like to hear >> opinions and ideas how it can be made wrapped into something trivial >> to use. > > I don't have ideas for Phabricator as I couldn't play with it so far. But just > to be clear "we" as Calligra or "we" as KDE? In both cases, I thought that we > were going to evaluate first, and in any case the bug handling part was not in > the center of the discussion for now (more focus on code review, tasks, but > not bugs for now - not before result reports and migration plans I haven't > seen at all around).
I can confirm we're still in the evaluation phase. At this time the task tracking features of Phabricator are intended to be used as a replacement for todo.kde.org (Kanboard) rather than as a replacement for bugs.kde.org if it is selected. > > Ciao > -- > Luigi Regards, Ben > > >>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe << >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
