El divendres, 9 de setembre de 2016, a les 9:12:03 CEST, Ralf Habacker va escriure: > Hi all, > > umbrello supports code import for several compiler languages. To > increase the code quality we are adding test code fragments to git > source to motivate developers to use them for unit tests. The fragments > looks like > > https://quickgit.kde.org/?p=umbrello.git&a=blob&h=ee1411a1bfaa0c0376b4fff28d > 45b9867cf2c053&hb=13a513d629e86e8cc98d750f1d9e5741bbc8791a&f=test%2Fimport%2 > Fcxx%2Fcxx11-alternative-function-syntax.h > > // https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B11#Alternative_function_syntax > > // #1 > template<class Lhs, class Rhs> > auto adding_func(const Lhs &lhs, const Rhs &rhs) -> decltype(lhs+rhs) > {return lhs + rhs;} > > // #2 > struct SomeStruct { > auto func_name(int x, int y) -> int; > }; > > auto SomeStruct::func_name(int x, int y) -> int { > return x + y; > }
Is that code being compiled? Cheers, Albert > > In the given example > https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#7._Licensing_of_Content > states: > > > "...When you re-use or re-distribute a text page developed by the > Wikimedia community, you agree to attribute the authors in any of the > following fashions: Through hyperlink (where possible) or URL to the > page or pages that you are re-using (since each page has a history page > that lists all authors and editors);" > > Because the fragment contains a link to the related source it looks okay > from my non-layers perspective. > > On adding such test code I got an email about unknown license at > https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/umbrello-devel/2016-September/020362.html. > From the related page https://community.kde.org/Policies/Licensing_Policy I > got the impression that this rule applies to real code compiled into a > library or application. Is refering to the original source also okay in > relation to this KDE license policy ? > > Regards > Ralf
