On Dienstag, 15. November 2016 18:00:34 CET Aleix Pol wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Matthias Kuhn <matth...@opengis.ch> wrote: > > I would like to see how much pyqt increases the size of the (not yet > optimized) runtime. I agree it can be interesting, but I'm not sure by > how much. > Also the fact that there's so many approaches for python Qt bindings > doesn't make things much simpler, and that's python alone. Does that > mean we want to have all languages in there? I'll be happy to work > with anyone who wants to get PyQt in their application, if we see that > we're getting so much projects that need PyQt that it makes sense, > then by all means it should go in. > > Having different run-times for applications that use KDE Frameworks > and applications that don't feels like shooting ourselves in the foot, > at this moment. Note that in Flatpak runtimes don't extend each other, > they duplicate, AFAIK.
If I understand http://flatpak.org/developer.html correctly: - optional/add-on parts can be referenced using Extensions - you may use several extensions from application and/or runtime Also runtimes seem to stack, see e.g. https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-sdk-images/tree/org.gnome.Sdk.json.in As far as I understand the OSTree repository format, even distinct runtimes which have overlapping content will not duplicate storage or download requirements, as OSTree is a content-addressed storage, although I may be wrong here. Kind regards, Stefan
