> On Feb. 4, 2017, 7:59 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Any reason this has not been commited?
Because there was no final decision. It is true that the Baloo database can be regenerated, but I would say that if we avoid a complete rebuild of the database after a Frameworks update, that would be good. Would it be better to read the old location if found and reserve the new one only for new database (or rebuilt) and switch to the new one for Frameworks 6? - Luigi ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129605/#review102382 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Dic. 12, 2016, 12:06 p.m., James Smith wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129605/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Dic. 12, 2016, 12:06 p.m.) > > > Review request for Baloo and Vishesh Handa. > > > Repository: baloo > > > Description > ------- > > Move the database into the XDG cache path. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/engine/global.cpp 4f511ac08f0fd18bd3c78b794f4ba7ccef88e75b > src/tools/balooctl/main.cpp 2a6b175ee599d7ca713adcbed80d3bd128e9dd63 > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129605/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Compile, run. > > > Thanks, > > James Smith > >
