El sáb., 9 de nov. de 2019 a la(s) 19:48, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau (kosse...@kde.org) escribió: > FWIW, everytime I had to deal with translations as developer (like checking > pot files as well as .po files contents) I found having the web interface and > its browsing feature very valuable to quickly find what I was looking for, > over having to locally mess around with svn commands and juggling between > commandline & file viewers. Including url bookmarks for quick access to > browsing certain sets of files. > > Incidents which I remember right now included: > * finding out whether extraction scripts were working as intended > * comparing translations seen by users over what they should see > > Are there any other KDE clients of the svn repos still around, besides > translation system? > Perhaps the "full clone" needed for WebSVN could be reduced to the translation > subtrees, would that improve situation to a degree if possible? (well, you > surely thought of this yourself, just in case)
This is unfortunately not possible. WebSVN needs a full copy of the repository with its history, not a svn checkout, and that can't be trimmed to a subtree. Or maybe you *can* extract a subtree, but then you can't keep that in sync with new changes that appear in the master repository. Even in git that's a giant pain. -- Nicolás