It being generated by AI is not the same as it being low quality though? Are we against low quality or against AI?
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 4:11 PM Akseli <akse...@akselmo.dev> wrote: > > On 12 May 2025 16.40.44 EEST, Harald Sitter <sit...@kde.org> wrote: > >I mean, I guess. > > > >I am not exactly sure what a sign somewhere will help. People can just > >ignore it, after all, they ignored the code of conduct (be > >considerate) as well as the seemingly obvious courtesy of not wasting > >other people's time... may as well ignore the sign. At the same time > >routing all input through anti-AI AIs is probably not a useful > >expenditure of time either. 🤷 > > > > Maybe it wont help, but at least we have a sign to tap on. "This was > obviously generated with AI, we dont allow that, bla bla" > > Rules will never be followed by bad actors but at least when they exist they > can be enforced. > > >On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 2:53 PM Akseli <akse...@akselmo.dev> wrote: > >> > >> Hi > >> > >> There's been a lot of "AI" slop spam to various KDE projects, bug reports, > >> forums, etc.. > >> > >> We should take a more public stance on disallowing all this slop. Lengthy > >> gitlab issues that are just full of nonsense generated by a bot just take > >> time out of everyones schedules, trying to decipher if its serious or not. > >> > >> Other projects have already done something similar, see for example: > >> https://discourse.gnome.org/t/loupe-no-longer-allows-generative-ai-contributions/27327 > >> > >> I don't care if someone uses those tools in their personal projects, but > >> bringing this slop in to our shared space just frustrates people and eats > >> resources to go through. > >> > >> Can we have somekind of official "please don't AI slop in our places" sign > >> somewhere? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> - Akseli > >> >
