On 19/05/2025 15:10, Jin Liu wrote:
Justin Zobel<jus...@1707.io> 于2025年5月19日周一 08:34写道：
From my understanding (what others have told me), AI generally does not
produce good quality code though. So how is that a benefit to society?
From my personal experience (what I, not others, have personally used
Github Copilot for months), AI makes coding a lot more enjoyable. When
I type an if branch, it completes the else branch. When I type the
first half of a lengthy function call, it completes the rest. My brain
spends a lot less time waiting for my fingers.
So I'm pretty sure it's a benefit to me personally. Is that a benefit
to society? I dunno.
And if KDE implements a ban on AI that excludes my usage, then it
would make contributing to KDE a lot less enjoyable for me, and I'm
pretty sure I'd no longer contribute to KDE and divert my time to
other projects without the ban. Is that a benefit to society? I dunno.
-Jin Liu
I understand that it makes everything easier. That doesn't matter in the
slightest when you cannot verify the original license of the code allows
you to use said code or that the license is compatible with KDE.
What this all boils down to, is KDE's liability regarding code from
unknown origins.
It's clear a lot of people don't care about theft or the environment and
are happy to use AI without thinking about the true impact.
