On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 08:49, Ben Taylor <bentaylor.solx86 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Adriaan de Groot <groot at kde.org> wrote: >> On Saturday 21 February 2009 04:05:20 pm Lukas Oboril wrote: >>> I think we should save our original FOSSgettext, FOSSlibiconv combo to >>> prevent another build troubles >> >> I'm really not very happy with that, simply because of the horrors involved >> with having three (Sun iconv, GNU iconv, and our own) iconv libraries and >> three gettext libraries installed on the system. I can live with libcdio >> being >> made smart enough to find the SUNW gettext, though. > > seeing as I've taken on the S10 builds, I have no issue other than I want it > to build/work with minimal effort. Stefan can probably comment on whether > Sun's iconv or the gnu iconv distributed in S10 is required. I suspect that > given the development path of the KDE4 Solaris and using FOSS's iconv, > there will be some "tweaking" required for the builds. > > Also, not using FOSSiconv from the perspective on maintaining consistency > between builds (S10, SXCE, OSOL) is concerning from the prospect of > problems. (It doesnt' run on S10, it runs on OSOL - type of thing)
SUNWgnu-gettext is recent in Nevada. It doesn't exist in S10. and It only delivers the executables, and not the libraries [ libiconv and libintl ]. S10 needs FOSSiconv. --Stefan -- Stefan Teleman KDE e.V. stefan.teleman at gmail.com
