On Tuesday 14 April 2009 18:01:47 Jan Hnatek wrote:
> Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> > On Monday 13 April 2009 20:25:16 Lukas Oboril wrote:
> > Perhaps we should once again define (stringently?) the build environment
> > for these packages. For instance saying "CBE 1.7.0" and checking for that
> > in both check-version.sh and adding it as build requires to the specs.
>
> I'm very much up for this wrt the -42 repo.
OK. Concrete suggestions? Can pkgtool handle package version requirements? We
might want to state something like:
BuildRequires: CBEenv > 1.6.9
I think the rpm pkgtool can do that. That would reduce the amount of willy-
nillyness around the build process; we wouldn't have to specify any other
build dependencies. Headers and stuff like that, though, remain a problem
(unless CBE implies SUNWhea and similar).
> Tbh, I'm working on an automated build system for VirtualBox to set up
> nightly builds. Currently it's OpenSolaris 111, CBE 1.7.0, pkgbuild
> 1.3.98, cmake+yasm from -42 (hm, this number... :)
> It should be ready in a few days.
Ooh, cool.
> Can I commit these tools to the repo, say ./specs/tools/vbox/?
As far as I'm concerned, yes.
> Does anyone have a public ftp where I could publish the logs?
> /I'll be asking around internally, so maybe I'll find another way/
You could scp them onto solaris.bionicmutton.org, for instance. I have no real
opinion on how to display them, though.
