On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Adriaan de Groot <groot at kde.org> wrote: > On Monday 01 December 2008 22:55:25 Ben Taylor wrote: >> FOSSlibgphoto for >> ltdl.h/libltdl.so. > > That is a spectacularly bizzarre dependency for pulling in something > completely unrelated to gphoto. Please reconsider. If we absolutely need ltdl > then we need to have a package for it, not some random thing that happens to > install it.
agreed. IIRC, we had discussed pulling in libltdl into the tree, but with the focus moving from S10 to SXCE/OSOL2008, I think that fell by the wayside. Perhaps we should just throw the ltdl.h and libltdl.so into it's own package like FOSShier, other than the fact that there isn't a sparc version. Lukas - if you have a code base for the x86 binaries that we can use, I'll spin up the sparc box and see about building it there so it can be available for both architectures on Solaris 10. > Anyway, if you are absolutely sure you have libX11.so.6 (you don't, except > possibly on new nv builds) then the app can stay in, but I for one would like > kstartperf to be simply removed. It's a hack. as I've mentioned before, my work is around validation of the packaging stuff, so if something doesn't build that should, I figure out why. As for determining whether something should be in or not, I'm the last guy you should ask. I never ran KDE until may this year.... :-) If you want it out, or "conditionally out", we can do that. Ben
