On Wednesday 17 April 2002 11:03, Thomas Diehl wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 17. April 2002 10:04 schrieb ?ric Bischoff: > > > If we start fixing all the "small things that would make another thing > > > clearer" we would invite the addition of tons of new strings. > > > > OK. But in the same message I report two "real mistakes" : > > - "paper.dvi" instead of "paper.tex" > > - a missing separator in the command line syntax > > Yes, this were the ones I had in mind when talking about "fixing broken > links" and the like.
OK. > > Does it mean that, when I report doc problems, I should classify between > > "cosmetical, markup & usability" and "misleading & error"? > > This is what I would suggest. New strings should only be introduced to the > branch if there are really important fixes. Fine with me. Thanks for the clarification, Thomas.
