-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 06 November 2002 14.51, you wrote: > | We are using SGML catalogs even though our docs are in XML, and the > | recent bug in libxml2 is specifically with SGML catalog handling. One of > | the responses there was "well, use proper catalogs" > > The bloody cheek: who was first to use catalogs at all? ;-)
Heh, I tried to resist thinking saying that too :) > Not really. I looked into it, but because it might break quite a > few things, I never performed the change. There's a shell script on www.xmlsoft.org that promises to do all the hard work, but it didn't quite live up to that when I tried it. Somewhere to start though. http://www.xmlsoft.org/catalog.html the script is somewhere near the bottom. > | Right after KDE 3.1 is released would be a very good time to do so, we'll > | have an entire release cycle to iron out any problems. If there is a > | really good reason to keep the SGML catalogs, I'm probably missing it. > > When is that precisely? I'm waiting for that to do some other > things too (like removing obsolete entities, and starting to > prepare for future DocBook versions). Final decision to be made on the 11th November, if the RC is going to be released as final, plus a couple of days for the tagging, last minute stuff, organization etc, and I suppose it's looking like about a week or so from now, which is why I thought this a good time to bring it up. Cheers, - -- Lauri Watts KDE Documentation: http://i18n.kde.org/doc/ KDE on FreeBSD: http://freebsd.kde.org/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9ymQ3/gUyA7PWnacRAk+rAJ9EbdqUsR2SJ2d1Y19JYGYrf/bATwCghJeV htNV6hWjidCv983uit0eHhQ= =v2MC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
