On Saturday 12 October 2002 10:42, ?ric Bischoff wrote: > On Saturday 12 October 2002 09:14, Pam R wrote:
> > But even if 50% of them were rubbish, 119 un-approved messages in > > several months is less than one a day, which is such a low rate > > that I would vote for making the list open, even if only to avoid > > the embarrassment of blocking a message from David Faure for 5 > > months :-( > > Yes. _that_ was bad. If you keep the list moderated, you can add exceptions to the moderated status on an individual basis. I've done this on kde-edu so that people like thd, coolo, and a few others can post without being subscribed to the list. It's also a convenient way of adding your work/secon/third email addresses without actually having to subscribe. A. -- Andy Fawcett | "In an open world without walls and fences, andy at athame.co.uk | we wouldn't need Windows and Gates." tap at lspace.org | -- anon
