On 6/3/05, Daniel Rutz <fotophool at gmail.com> wrote: > Philip (and everyone else), > > Hmmm. In an effort to get another view on this (because I hadn't seen > any other discussion of documentation in the event), I started a thread > in the Google Group for SoC. > [snip]
Seems like they're basically saying that the PDF generation and KDE-wide glossary ones should be fair game, whereas actually handwriting documentation wouldn't be. That's how I read it, anyway, and also how I read the information on Google Code's website. > Daniel Antonio -- http://www.funpic.hu/swf/numanuma.html
