> [: Burkhard L?ck :] > So my question is, what you prefer - one docbook/docmessages.po (as far as > possible/sensible) or splitted docbook/docmessages.po's?
I think the best solution is: multiple docbooks, single PO. Multiple docbooks is frequently more natural for authors, and single PO is more natural for translators. In other words, documentation source splitting should not have direct relation to PO splitting -- just like for code. If our current documentation extraction-injection toolchain does not allow for this differentiaton, that's one of its downsides... -- Chusslove Illich (?????? ????) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-doc-english/attachments/20120102/91680e8f/attachment.sig>
