https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=320775
--- Comment #13 from Luigi Toscano <luigi.toscano at tiscali.it> --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #8) > > Yeah, didn't realize we use nochunk anywhere else :-/ > > > > Maybe onechunk like > > /usr/share/xml/docbook/stylesheet/docbook-xsl/html/onechunk.xsl can help us > > here? > > > > No. I disagree. onechunk.xsl is the proper way. It includes chunk.xsl, but it sets some parameters. I was investigating if is more feasible to use onechunk.xsl directly or to replicate its behavior (I had other real-life priorities, but the work is still ongoing). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
