Am Dienstag, 18. Juni 2013, 16:27:27 schrieb T.C. Hollingsworth: > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Burkhard L?ck <lueck at hube-lueck.de> wrote: > > The file preferred_forms is from kde3, probably time to update its > > content? > > Attached a list of all widget names used in the visual dictionary, > > spelling in preferred_forms, aspell, dictionary + in the docbooks. > > Main differences: > > Checkbox, Menubar, Scrollbar, Titlebar. > > > > I leave it to the native speakers how to sync these differences. > > > > Probably we should add the missing words to the file preferred_forms for > > ebn: combo box, context menu, list box, progress bar, scroll bar, spin > > box. > My 2 cents: > > "[Cc]heck [bB]ox" 129 preferred forms / aspell ok > "[Cc]heck[bB]ox" 115 visual dictionary > > Revert to preferred forms -> consistent with "combo box", seems to be > winning ever so slightly ;-) > > "[Cc]ombo [bB]ox" 61 not in preferred forms / aspell ok / > visual dictionary > "[Cc]ombo[bB]ox" 34, > > ok > > "[Cc]ontext [mM]enu" 241 not in preferred forms / aspell ok / > visual dictionary > "[Cc]ontext[mM]enu" 5 > "[pP]opup [mM]enu" 67 preferred forms - Unify to context menu? > "[pP]opup[mM]enu" 1 > > Yes, I'm pretty sure we use "context menu" pretty much everywhere. > > "[dD]ialog [bB]ox" 200 not in preferred forms / aspell ok / > visual dictionary > "[dD]ialog[bB]ox" 0 > > please add > > "[dD]rop [dD]own [bB]ox" 89 preferred forms / aspell ok / visual > dictionary "[dD]rop[dD]own [bB]ox" 4 > "[dD]rop[dD]own[bB]ox" 0 > > ok, fix the 4 holdouts > > "[iI]con [lL]ist" 2 > "[iI]con[lL]ist" 0 > > ok assuming the former is the preferred form > > "[iI]nput [bB]ox" 11 preferred form "text box"? > "[iI]nput[bB]ox" 0 > "[iI]nput [fF]ield" 32 preferred form "text box"? > "[iI]nput[fF]ield" 0 > > yes, please > > "[lL]ist [bB]ox" 25 not in preferred forms / aspell ok / > visual dictionary > "[lL]ist[bB]ox" 25 > > I'd suggest we go with "List Box" since all the other Boxes aren't combined > > "[mM]enu [bB]ar" 59 aspell ok > "[mM]enu[bB]ar" 233 preferred forms / visual dictionary > > If I were king for a day I'd go with aspell on this one. Outside of > computing, words never get combined like with "bar" like this?it's > "chocolate bar", not "chocolatebar" or "wine bar", not "winebar". I'm > not sure what makes computing "bars" such special snowflakes. > > But it seems the rest of the project has decided on "menubar", so > let's go with that. > > "[pP]rogress [bB]ar" 13 not in preferred forms / visual dictionary > "[pP]rogress[bB]ar" 0 > > please add > > "[rR]adio [bB]utton" 40 not in preferred forms / aspell ok / > visual dictionary > "[rR]adio[bB]utton" 9 (only kommander->obsolete) > > please add > > "[sS]croll [bB]ar" 10 not in preferred forms / aspell ok > "[sS]croll[bB]ar" 57 visual dictionary > > scrollbar -> for consistency with "menubar" and it's clearly used more > > "[sS]pin [bB]ox" 17 not in preferred forms / aspell ok / > visual dictionary > "[sS]pin[bB]ox" 39 > > Spin Box -> for consistency among the "boxes", though there will be a > lot of docbooks to fix. :-/ > > "[sS]tatus [bB]ar" 126 preferred forms / aspell ok / visual > dictionary "[sS]tatus[bB]ar" 139 > > I guess "statusbar" for consistency with the other "bars", though this > spelling isn't nearly as widespread as the others... > > "[tT]ext [bB]ox" 204 preferred forms / aspell ok / visual > dictionary "[tT]ext[bB]ox" 4 > > ok, fix those 4 > > "[tT]itle [bB]ar" 17 preferred forms / aspell ok > "[tT]itle[bB]ar" 49 visual dictionary > > titlebar -> consistency among bars, clear winner > > "[tT]ool [bB]ar" 6 > "[tT]ool[bB]ar" 1125 preferred forms / aspell ok / visual > dictionary > > toolbar -> same > Ok, if nobody else steps up with comments/corrections/questions in the next few days I'll try to get that updated and into EBN.
One personal note regarding EBN fixes: "EBN only fixes are *EVIL* " Please keeps in mind that a commit only with with ebn issue fixes affect some 20-30 translation teams. In addition a change of a single char in a docbook can break the generation of all language docbooks, in worst case even the build of a complete language. If you fix EBN issues in a docbook please at least proofread the docbook content as well to verify there is no wrong or outdated content. > >> > * Should we use the "The Plasma Desktop" section from > >> > http://userbase.kde.org/User:Claus_chr/Visual_Dictionary ? > >> > >> IDK, Fundamentals really doesn't cover much Plasma stuff at all; we > >> leave that to the Plasma Handbook. > > > > You are right, it is better suited in the Plasma Handbook, between Plasma > > Widgets and Containments and Panel? > > Works for me. :-) > See RR http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111110/ Thanks. -- Burkhard L?ck
