Randall Wood wrote: > Question 4: Is there some authoritative source of current entities and > acceptable XML tags? Going through these old (2003, 2004) docs like the > Primer and the Markup Guide, it seems a lot of XML tags have been used that > are no longer legitimate and lead to question marks in the rendered text. > > <quote></quote> is one that comes to mind, but there are many others that in > my PDF version of the Primer at least, didn't render correctly. If the DTD > has changed I'll perhaps do a sweep and clean out these old tags so the docs > look right.
That's strange, we still use <quote> in our KDE documentation (based on Docbook 4.2, and I don't think we added them). And afaik newer versions of Docbook 4.x should be backwards-compatible. Unless I'm missing something. Which version are they based on? (ok, I should check myself :) Regards -- Luigi
