----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109401/#review28930 -----------------------------------------------------------
LGTM for the most part. I really don't think we should be using &kappname; at all in Fundamentals TBH. I think using &kde-sc; explicitly is less confusing. But this is my fault, so I can fix it later. ;-) doc/fundamentals/install.docbook <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109401/#comment21631> I think adding a the so it reads "Installing the &kappname;" will flow better, don't you think? ("Installing KDE Software Collection" vs Installing the KDE Software Collection") doc/fundamentals/install.docbook <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109401/#comment21632> the &kappname; doc/fundamentals/install.docbook <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109401/#comment21633> the &kappname; doc/fundamentals/ui.docbook <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109401/#comment21634> this should use &kde; but I think that's my fault too :-/ - T.C. Hollingsworth On March 11, 2013, 12:44 a.m., Luigi Toscano wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109401/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 11, 2013, 12:44 a.m.) > > > Review request for Documentation. > > > Description > ------- > > &kappname; (which here is the same entity as "&kde-sc;") has been used > sometimes instead of &kde; because it refers to the SC (install.docbook). > > A name has been added to &kde; (like "&kde; applications/software") as the > content is general for any KDE applications, and for sure it is not about the > KDE project. To be honest, when cmake is mentioned, even "&kde; software" is > a bit restrictive, as for example Oxygen icons use cmake too, but I would say > it is more a details for developers in this document. > Similarly, &kappname; has been replaced with &kde; when it was close to such > names ("applications"), as the content is valid for any KDE Platform-based > application. > > > A bit different change when the content of About KDE is described, as it > clearly state the version of KDE Development Platform in addition to the > program version, and not a generic KDE version. > > > Diffs > ----- > > doc/fundamentals/config.docbook e750dfe > doc/fundamentals/install.docbook 71db09c > doc/fundamentals/tasks.docbook 71c6288 > doc/fundamentals/ui.docbook eb962df > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109401/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Luigi Toscano > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-doc-english/attachments/20130311/64b283c1/attachment.html>
